On July 12, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a wage-and-hour lawsuit in the Orange County Superior Court titled, William Sanchez Martinez et al. v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc. et al., (Case No. 30-2016-00863159-CU-OE-CXC). On September 18, 2017, the lawsuit was amended to assert claims for unpaid wages, minimum wages, overtime, meal and rest break violations, recovery period violations, waiting time penalties, wage statement violations, Wage Theft Prevention Act violations, conversion, unfair competition (UCL), Private Attorneys General Action (PAGA) penalties, and unreimbursed business expenses.
On September 13, 2019, after three years of prosecution, the Court granted class certification. On May 19, 2022, the court ordered that the PAGA and UCL claims would go to trial first. Trial on those representative claims began on June 20, 2022.
Following the first phase of the trial, on August 18, 2023, pursuant to stipulation, the class claims were dismissed, without prejudice, and the Court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against the defendants, JR Steel, Jeffrey Rauch, and Becky Rauch, jointly and severally, in the amount of $467,777. That judgment included was comprised of $316,850 in civil penalties, of which 75% ($237,637.50) was allocated to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and 25% ($79,212.50), along with $150,927 in reimbursement of work-related expenses, to Plaintiffs and their coworkers. The Court also held that Plaintiffs were entitled to seek attorneys’ fees and costs.
On June 24, 2024, the court amended the judgment to award $934,650 in attorneys’ fees and $36,079.05 in costs. As a result, the total amount awarded to Plaintiffs and their counsel was $1,438,506.05.
After judgment was entered, Plaintiffs collection efforts were complicated by bankruptcy proceedings. On February 12, 2025, the individual defendants filed for bankruptcy (In re Jeffrey Scott Rauch and Becky Ann Rauch, Case No. 8:25-bk-10358-SC).
In October 2025, the parties reached a settlement to resolve the judgment and the bankruptcy-related disputes. Under the agreement, defendants agreed to pay a gross settlement amount of $300,000, subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The settlement represented a substantial discount from the more than $1.4 million judgment and amended judgment previously entered in Plaintiffs’ favor, reflecting the realities and risks presented by Defendants' compromised financial condition and the corresponding bankruptcy. The settlement allocated $198,000 to attorneys’ fees and costs, $68,550 to civil penalties, and $33,450 in reimbursement of work-related expenses, to Plaintiffs and their coworkers - the exact same apportionment ratio of the original trial judgment.