Martinez v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc.

Martinez v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc.Martinez v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc.Martinez v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc.

CALL (714) 242-4557

  • Home
  • Case Documents
  • More
    • Home
    • Case Documents

Martinez v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc.

Martinez v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc.Martinez v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc.Martinez v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc.

CALL (714) 242-4557

  • Home
  • Case Documents

Welcome to the JR Steel Class Action Lawsuit Website

Welcome to the JR Steel Class Action Lawsuit WebsiteWelcome to the JR Steel Class Action Lawsuit WebsiteWelcome to the JR Steel Class Action Lawsuit Website

Read here about an important lawsuit brought by JR Steel workers to recover wages and overtime they should have been paid

Welcome to the JR Steel Class Action Lawsuit Website

Welcome to the JR Steel Class Action Lawsuit WebsiteWelcome to the JR Steel Class Action Lawsuit WebsiteWelcome to the JR Steel Class Action Lawsuit Website

Read here about an important lawsuit brought by JR Steel workers to recover wages and overtime they should have been paid

About Us / Sobre Nosotros

Summary of lawsuit:

 On July 12, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a wage-and-hour lawsuit in the Orange County Superior Court titled, William Sanchez Martinez et al. v. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc. et al., (Case No. 30-2016-00863159-CU-OE-CXC). On September 18, 2017, the lawsuit was amended to assert claims for unpaid wages, minimum wages, overtime, meal and rest break violations, recovery period violations, waiting time penalties, wage statement violations, Wage Theft Prevention Act violations, conversion, unfair competition (UCL), Private Attorneys General Action (PAGA) penalties, and unreimbursed business expenses.
 

On September 13, 2019, after three years of prosecution, the Court granted class certification. On May 19, 2022, the court ordered that the PAGA and UCL claims would go to trial first. Trial on those representative claims began on June 20, 2022.
 

Following the first phase of the trial, on August 18, 2023, pursuant to stipulation, the class claims were dismissed, without prejudice, and the Court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against the defendants, JR Steel, Jeffrey Rauch, and Becky Rauch, jointly and severally, in the amount of $467,777. That judgment included was comprised of $316,850 in civil penalties, of which 75% ($237,637.50) was allocated to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and 25% ($79,212.50), along with $150,927 in reimbursement of work-related expenses, to Plaintiffs and their coworkers. The Court also held that Plaintiffs were entitled to seek attorneys’ fees and costs.
 

On June 24, 2024, the court amended the judgment to award $934,650 in attorneys’ fees and $36,079.05 in costs.  As a result, the total amount awarded to Plaintiffs and their counsel was $1,438,506.05.
 

After judgment was entered, Plaintiffs collection efforts were complicated by bankruptcy proceedings. On February 12, 2025, the individual defendants filed for bankruptcy (In re Jeffrey Scott Rauch and Becky Ann Rauch, Case No. 8:25-bk-10358-SC).  
 

In October 2025, the parties reached a settlement to resolve the judgment and the bankruptcy-related disputes. Under the agreement, defendants agreed to pay a gross settlement amount of $300,000, subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The settlement represented a substantial discount from the more than $1.4 million judgment and amended judgment previously entered in Plaintiffs’ favor, reflecting the realities and risks presented by Defendants' compromised financial condition and the corresponding bankruptcy. The settlement allocated $198,000 to attorneys’ fees and costs, $68,550 to civil penalties, and $33,450 in reimbursement of work-related expenses, to Plaintiffs and their coworkers - the exact same apportionment ratio of the original trial judgment.  

Resumen de la demanda:

 El 12 de julio de 2016, los demandantes presentaron una demanda por cuestiones de sueldos y horas en el Tribunal Superior del Condado de Orange, titulada William Sánchez Martínez y otros vs. JR Steel Reinforcing Construction Services, Inc. y otros, (Caso No. 30-2016-00863159-CU-OE-CXC). El 18 de septiembre de 2017, la demanda se modificó para incluir reclamos por sueldos no pagados, sueldo mínimo, horas extras (“overtime”), violaciones de los períodos de comida y descanso, violaciones de períodos de recuperación, penalidades por tiempo de espera, violaciones en los comprobantes de pago (o talones de cheques), violaciones a la Ley de Prevención del Robo de Sueldos, apropiación indebida, competencia injusta (UCL), penalidades bajo la Ley de Fiscales Privados (PAGA) y gastos de trabajo no reembolsados.


El 13 de septiembre de 2019, después de tres años llevando el caso, el tribunal aprobó la certificación de la clase. El 19 de mayo de 2022, el tribunal ordenó que primero se llevaran a juicio las reclamaciones bajo PAGA y UCL. El juicio sobre esas reclamaciones representativas comenzó el 20 de junio de 2022.


Después de la primera fase del juicio, el 18 de agosto de 2023, y conforme a un acuerdo entre las partes, las reclamaciones colectivas se desestimaron sin prejuicio. Además, el tribunal dictó sentencia a favor de los demandantes y en contra de los demandados JR Steel, Jeffrey Rauch y Becky Rauch, solidariamente, por un monto de $467,777. Esa cantidad incluía $316,850 en penalidades civiles, de las cuales el 75% ($237,637.50) se asignó a la Agencia de Trabajo y Desarrollo Laboral de California (“California Labor and Workforce Development Agency”), y el 25% ($79,212.50), junto con $150,927 por reembolso de gastos relacionados con el trabajo, se otorgó a los demandantes y sus compañeros de trabajo. El tribunal también determinó que los demandantes tenían derecho a solicitar honorarios de abogados y costos.


El 24 de junio de 2024, el tribunal modificó la sentencia para otorgar $934,650 en honorarios de abogados y $36,079.05 en costos. Como resultado, el monto total otorgado a los demandantes y a sus abogados fue de $1,438,506.05.


Después de que se dictó la sentencia, los esfuerzos de cobro de los demandantes se complicaron debido a procedimientos de bancarrota. El 12 de febrero de 2025, los demandados individuales se declararon en bancarrota (In re Jeffrey Scott Rauch y Becky Ann Rauch, Caso No. 8:25-bk-10358-SC).


En octubre de 2025, las partes llegaron a un acuerdo para resolver la sentencia y las disputas relacionadas con la bancarrota. Según el acuerdo, los demandados acordaron pagar un monto total de $300,000, sujeto a la aprobación del Tribunal de Bancarrota.

El acuerdo representó un descuento considerable en comparación con la sentencia y la sentencia modificada previamente otorgadas a favor de los demandantes por más de $1.4 millones, reflejando la situación financiera complicada de los demandados y los riesgos asociados con la bancarrota. El acuerdo asignó $198,000 para honorarios de abogados y costos, $68,550 para penalidades civiles, y $33,450 para el reembolso de gastos relacionados con el trabajo a los demandantes y sus compañeros de trabajo, manteniendo exactamente la misma proporción de distribución que en la sentencia original del juicio.

Settlement Payments / Pagos del acuerdo

How do I get my settlement payment?

How do I get my settlement payment?

How do I get my settlement payment?

The Court has appointed an independent company (Phoenix Settlement Administrators) to transmit the settlement proceeds to the State of California and JR Steel employees. Settlement checks are expected to be mailed within the next 60 to 90 days. You can contact the law office of Denis & Rasi, PC, at no charge, if you have any questions or comments regarding the lawsuit and/or the settlement.  If you have moved to a new address since you worked for JR Steel, we encourage you to contact Denis & Rasi, PC (714-242-4557), or Phoenix Settlement Administrators (800-523-5773; 949-344-8851) to verify and/or update your contact information to ensure you receive your settlement check.

¿Cómo recibo mi cheque?

How do I get my settlement payment?

How do I get my settlement payment?

El tribunal ha designado a una empresa independiente (Phoenix Settlement Administrators) para distribuir los fondos del acuerdo al Estado de California y a los empleados de JR Steel. Se espera que los cheques del acuerdo se envíen por correo dentro de los próximos 60 a 90 días. Puede comunicarse sin costo con la oficina legal de Denis & Rasi, PC, si tiene alguna pregunta o comentario sobre la demanda y/o el acuerdo. Si se ha mudado desde que trabajó para JR Steel, le recomendamos que se comunique con Denis & Rasi, PC (714-242-4557) o con Phoenix Settlement Administrators (800-523-5773; 949-344-8851) para verificar y/o actualizar su información de contacto y así asegurarse de recibir su cheque.

Contact Us

The Attorneys representing the Plaintiffs

We were approved by the court to represent the aggrieved employees. Our firm’s primary focus has been in the employment arena litigating individual and class action disputes involving misclassification, unpaid overtime/wages, meal and rest period violations, unpaid reimbursements, unpaid vacation and other vested benefits, sexual harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination. 

Denis & Rasi, PC - Paul Denis and Ethan Rasi

38 Corporate Park, Irvine, California 92606, United States

(714) 242-4557

Email the attorneys

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cancel

Copyright © 2017 Denis & Rasi, PC - All Rights Reserved.   ****NOTE: This web site is intended to merely communicate information regarding an existing proposed class action which may affect individuals' labor law rights. It is neither intended, nor shall operate, as a solicitation concerning the availability for professional employment of a member or a law firm.  


Powered by